Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract in Construction in USA

Understanding the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Contract

A Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract in U.S. construction projects is a contractual agreement in which a contractor commits to completing a project for a maximum cost. Under this model, the owner is assured that the final price will not exceed a predetermined ceiling, regardless of the actual expenses incurred. If the project costs less than the GMP, the savings are often shared between the owner and the contractor based on the terms of the agreement.

Key Elements of a GMP Contract in U.S. Construction

A GMP contract integrates several critical components that define its structure and enforceability:

Defined Maximum Cost Limit

The most prominent feature is the capped price, which protects the owner from cost overruns unless there are approved changes in project scope. This maximum price includes all direct and indirect construction costs, such as:

  • Materials and supplies
  • Labor and wages
  • Subcontractor fees
  • Construction equipment
  • Overhead and profit
  • General conditions
  • Contingencies

Open-Book Cost Accounting

The open-book provision enables the owner to review all project-related expenses. This includes access to:

  • Invoices and receipts
  • Subcontractor agreements
  • Change orders
  • Payroll records

This level of transparency builds trust between the contractor and the owner, ensuring complete visibility into cost allocation and savings.

Shared Savings Clause

If the final construction cost comes in below the guaranteed maximum price, the contractor and owner may split the cost savings. This incentivizes the contractor to deliver the project efficiently and cost-effectively, promoting smarter material sourcing, better scheduling, and leaner project management.

Benefits of a Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract

Cost Control and Financial Security

By capping the total project cost, GMP contracts provide financial predictability, particularly useful for public agencies, institutions, and developers managing budget-sensitive projects. The risk of cost overruns shifts primarily to the contractor, which protects the owner’s financial investment.

Early Contractor Involvement (ECI)

GMP contracts typically involve contractors during the preconstruction phase, allowing them to:

  • Analyze project scope
  • Perform value engineering
  • Develop accurate cost estimates
  • Identify potential risks early

Early collaboration leads to better planning, reduced rework, and improved design-to-budget alignment.

Improved Project Efficiency

The shared savings model encourages cost-conscious decision-making and improved project execution. Contractors are motivated to:

  • Avoid unnecessary delays
  • Control subcontractor performance
  • Use resources efficiently

This results in timely delivery, optimized budgets, and streamlined operations.

Contingency and Allowance Management in GMP Contracts

Contractor’s Contingency

The contractor’s contingency is included in the GMP to cover unforeseen conditions that arise during construction, such as:

  • Design conflicts
  • Material delivery issues
  • Field conditions not identified during planning

Use of this contingency must be justified and documented to prevent misuse or cost padding.

Owner’s Contingency

Separate from the GMP, an owner’s contingency may be held to accommodate:

  • Scope enhancements
  • Upgrades to finishes or equipment
  • Time-sensitive change orders

This reserve provides flexibility without triggering renegotiation of the GMP.

Comparison With Other Contract Types in U.S. Construction

GMP vs Fixed Price Contracts

In a fixed-price (lump sum) contract, the contractor agrees to a total price for completing the entire project, regardless of actual costs. Unlike GMP:

  • No cost savings are shared with the owner
  • Change orders can be more adversarial
  • Limited cost transparency

GMP contracts offer greater collaboration and financial openness while still capping risk.

GMP vs Cost-Plus Contracts

Cost-plus contracts reimburse the contractor for actual expenses plus a negotiated fee, with no guaranteed ceiling. Compared to GMP:

  • Higher financial risk for the owner
  • Lack of budget predictability
  • No cost overrun protection

A GMP structure merges cost-plus transparency with fixed-price discipline.

GMP vs Time and Material Contracts

Time and material agreements are suitable for small or undefined scope work. They pay for actual hours worked and materials used, which can lead to:

  • Unlimited costs
  • Low budgeting control
  • Limited incentive for efficiency

A GMP contract provides project scope definition and financial assurance, making it better suited for large-scale construction.

Industries That Frequently Use GMP Contracts in the USA

Several industries in the United States prefer GMP contracts due to the balance of accountability and flexibility, including:

  • Healthcare (hospitals, labs, medical facilities)
  • Education (universities, schools, student housing)
  • Government (city halls, courthouses, federal buildings)
  • Transportation (airports, transit systems)
  • Commercial Development (offices, retail centers, hotels)

These sectors require budget-conscious delivery models that align with public funding, donor contributions, or investor capital.

Establishing a Guaranteed Maximum Price

The GMP is typically defined after completion of a detailed preconstruction process, which involves:

  • Design development review
  • Subcontractor bidding
  • Construction phasing and sequencing
  • Risk identification and mitigation planning
  • Escalation and market fluctuation considerations

At this stage, the contractor presents a formal GMP proposal, including itemized estimates, contingency reserves, schedule baselines, and risk allowances.

Contract Provisions That Govern GMP Projects

Key clauses found in a GMP contract include:

  • GMP Amendment: Final document stating the total guaranteed price, scope, and schedule
  • Change Management Protocols: Define how scope changes are priced and approved
  • Cost Savings Sharing: Determines the percentage split of unspent funds
  • Dispute Resolution Methods: Outlines mediation, arbitration, or litigation procedures
  • Contingency Usage Rules: Dictate how contractor contingency can be accessed and reported

These contractual provisions ensure alignment of expectations and minimize legal disputes.

Risks and Challenges Associated With GMP Contracts

Although GMP contracts reduce owner risk, they present challenges for the contractor:

  • Tight budget margins
  • Increased administrative effort for documentation
  • Responsibility for overruns due to estimation errors
  • Pressure to control subcontractors’ costs

Contractors must maintain strict internal cost controls, quality management systems, and clear communication to succeed in a GMP arrangement.

Project Delivery Models Supporting GMP Contracts

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)

Under CMAR, the Construction Manager (CM) is engaged during design development and ultimately assumes responsibility for delivering the project within the GMP. The CM:

  • Advises on constructability and logistics
  • Prepares cost estimates and value engineering
  • Executes trade buyouts
  • Oversees construction execution

This model allows the owner to benefit from early collaboration and contractual cost protection.

Design-Build With GMP

In a Design-Build project, the contractor and designer form a single entity that offers a GMP contract. It ensures:

  • Streamlined communication
  • Fast-tracked scheduling
  • Integrated design and construction services

The Design-Build GMP model supports agility and unified accountability.

Best Practices for Managing GMP Projects

To maximize value in a GMP contract, owners and contractors should follow best practices, including:

  • Developing a detailed scope of work before GMP finalization
  • Maintaining real-time cost tracking tools
  • Conducting regular progress meetings and financial reviews
  • Using third-party cost verification
  • Enforcing strict change order protocols
  • Auditing contingency and allowance expenditures

When executed correctly, a Guaranteed Maximum Price contract delivers cost control, high transparency, and successful project outcomes.


End of Article.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *